Evaluating effective sowing date for better yield production of lady finger under prevailing climatic conditions

Authors

  • punhoonkhan Author
  • Muhammad Umair Author
  • Ammar Rasheed Author
  • Dost Jan Author
  • Muhammad Ammar Yasir Author
  • Ambreen Qasim Author
  • Aidah Baloch Author
  • Hammad Ali Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.63075/e9wfr872

Keywords:

Growth pattern, Assimilation, Yield production, Climate change, Sustainability

Abstract

This research intends to examine the relationship between tax revenue and government expenditure in Pakistan, with a focus on testing the fiscal synchronization hypothesis and assessing the indicators of future fiscal sustainability. The growth of crops is directly influenced by growing degree days. Fluctuations in mean temperature reduce the yield of crops, particularly lady finger. Evaluating sowing dates is essential for achieving higher yield production. This study aimed to evaluate the yield aspects of lady finger under varying sowing dates. The experiment was designed using a Completely Randomized Design (CRD) approach, incorporating three biological replications. The sowing dates are as follows: (1) SD1: January 15, (2) SD2: February 15, (3) SD3: March 15, and (4) SD4: April 15. The results indicated that plant height, stem diameter, pods per plant, and individual pod weight increased by 12%, 21%, 33%, and 39%, respectively, in SD3 compared to SD2, attributed to higher growing degree days. This was ascribed to increased nitrogen content and chlorophyll production by 21% and 28% in SD3 compared to SD2. The elevated SD4 exhibited detrimental effects on growth and yield parameters. The SD3 indicates an optimal sowing choice for achieving higher yields of lady finger in the trending climatic conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-30

How to Cite

Evaluating effective sowing date for better yield production of lady finger under prevailing climatic conditions. (2025). Annual Methodological Archive Research Review, 3(7), 12-22. https://doi.org/10.63075/e9wfr872

Similar Articles

1-10 of 115

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.